ARM Debate

[QMESAR]

In my opinion it would be a logical step for MATRIX to support the full Microchip product line ,you are supporting 8,and 16 bit MCHP micro's then the logical step would be to add the PIC32
that in any case has a better performance that the ARM M3 and M4 cores ,the standard core mark listing shows this as a fact .
Addition of new devices to your ARM portfolio is also necessary however as said you should include PIC32

Regards

[STibor]

Hello!
Interesting topic.
Development will be ARM controller?
ST 32F429IDISCOVERY cheap and fast.
Will Cortex M4 Flowcode?
I'm buying it.

http://www.st.com/web/catalog/tools/FM1 ... 2/PF259090
http://www.newark.com/stmicroelectronic ... dp/06X3667

[mscrace81]

Hello,

Are there anymore updates/developments/news on STM32F compatibility with Flowcode?

Kind regards,

Matt

[BChappy]

Hello,

I was about to ask the same Matt!
I share the opinion here, in a previous comment, that the PIC32 would be a logical step, and I have a particular preference for the Microchip MCU family within one programming environment.
However a few customers use ARM, specifically STM32F(103) devices appear to be popular.
Thank you

Regards

Brian

[Rudi]

hi guys

what is the actually thinking for support STM32F4 ARM Coretex M4 in Flowcode ?

best wishes
rudi

Example:
http://www.seeedstudio.com/depot/EMW316 ... Path=19_20
http://hackaday.com/2015/07/13/new-part ... 66-killer/
https://hackadaycom.files.wordpress.com ... mw3165.pdf