Matrix user forums

Hello !! It's been a long time !! And another problem ... Sorry! :oops: We have to correct an old FCV5 program a little bit. I thought the simplest and fastest way would be the version it was written in, FCV5, but ...! I can simulate it in FCV5 but when creating the HEx file there is the following e...

Thanks a lot Benj...now it runs.

Hi Benj Unfortunately it has not effected except that the compiler / linker print this error messages, which has not been shown befor :cry: ! CC:\Program Files (x86)\Flowcode 6\CAL\PIC\PIC_CAL_PWM.c(121): error: left operand must be l-value C:\Program Files (x86)\Flowcode 6\CAL\PIC\PIC_CAL_PWM.c(121...

I have made the same small program with FCV5, and lo and behold ..... with FCV5 function all 4 PWM outputs

With detours with the MPELAB IPE I can now program the chip. The goal would be however already that I can program directly from FCV6 and the ICD3. But unfortunately I have the next problem. I think the 16F1827 can output PWM signals at the pins RA3, RA4, RB3 and RB6. Unfortunately, I can do that onl...

I have finally taken the step to FCV6. From v3 to v4 to v5 I had no problems. Now I have a problem with the compiler or programmer options. How the hell can they save they remain as I adjusting !!!!!! Every time I look, the Programmer options that I have written are empty again! What am I doing wron...

Thanks a Lot ...now it works

The same problem again and again ?
At least a similar, only the Pic is different .
I need the Ext Int input(RA2, Pin 17), the simulation does not work or I do something wrong. Can someone help me ?
I would like use the 16F1507, in the appendix a small test program. I work with Flowcode 6.

I'm trying (with my bad english) to explain: At the moment I'm not as far as I could complain about errors. The difference from V5 to V6 is for me very large, can not be compared as from V3 to V5. V6 is a new program where many things are totally different as in the V5 for me. It is not a switch, it...

Thanks for the help. I will try it soon.

Do I understand that correctly? FCV5 will soon no longer supported?
Although I have a FCV6, but I can not imagine at the moment to upgrade to this version.

I have bypassed my previously described problem, but my problem is too stupid? Or am I doing something really wrong? Or is there no solution for this?

I have a problem with the TMR1 counter in Pic 16F1829. I want to display an analog value, that I reading about the An3, on an SPI display. The display I want refresh on the TMR1 interrupt (about 1 Hz). The problem is that simulation works with all counters, but on the hardware, it does not work with...

oooo Yesssss....that helps

When I select the internal Oscilator with 2Mhz it shows the PWM period of 500us (PWM channel 3, period register 249, prescaler 1) in the simulation. But measured by the chip it is 2ms, which is exactly 4x more. And i think, the same procedure applies to the delay times. I doing something wrong? Or I...

That fact I really overlooked.
With 254 in the period register are at 255 duty cycle 100% PWM at the output.
Thank you very much for the note.

This means that you can only with the PWM tool, PWM output can never be adjusted to 100% on Flowcode, or am I overlooking something?

Thank you for the fast answer. The problem I have in a bigger project in which the value for the PWM is calculated constant. The posted program is just an example. But at 100% PWM, it will behave just the same. I have rewritten the sample program, but the effect is the same. See the new example prog...

I have a small problem with the PWM on 16F1829.
I've noticed that I can not set PWM output to 100% . In the simulation 100% is really 100%, no negative Peak, output 100% on high level.
In the hardware I measure a small negative peak also at 100%. Am I doing something wrong?

Thanks for Help.

Thanks for the help. The simulation now works well. However, when I burn the small test program on the chip, it does not work. On a 12F615 it runs. On 16F1824 not. The simulation runs with both chips. Am I doing something wrong? What I noticed is that at the 16F1824, not all oscilator options are av...

Hello Benj
It works. Thanks a Lot.
But how can I Simulate a pushbutton on the Int input in single step mode?

OK the Port interrupt works.
The INT input RA2 pin 11 does not work for the simulation.
Or do I make something wrong?

Next Chip same Problem ?

Is it possible that the same problem also exists at 16F1824 ?
Or is there already a solution for it ?

Thanks for your help.
For old programs is still not working simulation. But this is not very bad.
Important as that is, it works for new programs and now looks good.

Thanks a lot.

Again a correction. When I draw a new program then the simulation works, the input and port interrupt. But I can no longer open the port interrupt properties menu and therefore I can no longer configure the inputs(turn on or off) The "old" programs still fail to simulate. If I "draw" again, they wor...

I have copy the file in the path C:\Programme\Flowcode\v5\FCD and tested my program again, but unfortunately I see no difference.