Search found 127 matches
- Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:59 am
- Forum: User Components
- Topic: Help to create a gLCD_KS0108 variant
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15322
Re: Help to create a gLCD_KS0108 variant
Hi, well the mod is just adapt the gLCD display from 128x64 to 192x64. The design of the display is just a third KS0108 chip added on the board and one extra control line as input (CS3). So when you have to draw something >128 you need to use the CS3 control. Maybe should be an idee to your team to ...
- Sun Sep 15, 2013 8:45 am
- Forum: User Components
- Topic: Help to create a gLCD_KS0108 variant
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15322
Re: Help to create a gLCD_KS0108 variant
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation, I thougt that it was possible to create a new component (base component) and edit the code to add the extra CS3 pin and off course add some lines to integrate the extra KS0108 chip.
But it seems not possible I presume ?
Best regards,
Bernard
Thanks for the explanation, I thougt that it was possible to create a new component (base component) and edit the code to add the extra CS3 pin and off course add some lines to integrate the extra KS0108 chip.
But it seems not possible I presume ?
Best regards,
Bernard
- Wed Sep 11, 2013 2:24 pm
- Forum: User Components
- Topic: Help to create a gLCD_KS0108 variant
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15322
Help to create a gLCD_KS0108 variant
Hello all, I'm trying to create a new component for an LCD display I have. It's a KS0108 but with 192x64 dots so it haves three KS0108 chips onboard and n extra CS3 pin input. I was trying to first make a clone of the existing KS0108 component but unfortunately the exported component doesn't have an...
- Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:37 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V5
- Topic: using internal DAC of a 16f1823
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2156
Re: using internal DAC of a 16f1823
Hi Ben,
Just test compiled in Flowcode and seems to work !
Now just waiting after my Chip
Thanks !
Just test compiled in Flowcode and seems to work !
Now just waiting after my Chip
Thanks !
- Mon Mar 18, 2013 2:08 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V5
- Topic: using internal DAC of a 16f1823
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2156
using internal DAC of a 16f1823
Hello, In my new project I need to decode some bytes (with USART) and convert them to an anolog signal. I thought to use the 16f1823 because he has the USART and the DAC onboard. But ! I'm unable to find how to use the DAC (located on RA0) with Flowcode... Can someone give me an advice ? Regards, Be...
- Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:46 am
- Forum: Flowcode V5
- Topic: Problem to write internal EEprom
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5398
Re: Problem to write internal EEprom
Thanks all
- Sun Feb 12, 2012 3:14 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V5
- Topic: Problem to write internal EEprom
- Replies: 6
- Views: 5398
Re: Problem to write internal EEprom
Hello Tiny,
I had the same problem and can confirm it's only in simulation
http://www.matrixmultimedia.com/mmforum ... 29&t=10055
@David
Some news about an update
Regards
I had the same problem and can confirm it's only in simulation
http://www.matrixmultimedia.com/mmforum ... 29&t=10055
@David
Some news about an update
Regards
- Fri Feb 03, 2012 4:28 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V5
- Topic: Check for updates error http 404
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2567
Check for updates error http 404
Hello,
When I try to use the "Check for updates " in help tab, my browser returns me a http 404 error page not found.
I'm running v5.0.0.0 but not sure if there are updates
Regards,
When I try to use the "Check for updates " in help tab, my browser returns me a http 404 error page not found.
I'm running v5.0.0.0 but not sure if there are updates
Regards,
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:01 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: V5 Upgrade ?
- Replies: 69
- Views: 37676
Re: V5 Upgrade ?
Hi Jorgen, No problem :wink: , and thank you also. I made a project today that seems to be fine, I will compile it tomorrrow to test it out because I found a little bug in the EEprom simulator (see other post). But generally I find the new layout better and faster to work with :) Kind regards, Bernard
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 6:16 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: A little bug in V5
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9710
Re: A little bug in V5
Thanks Ben,
By the end of the week I will be ready with my PCB.
You all at Matrix have done a big job
Regards,
Bernard
By the end of the week I will be ready with my PCB.
You all at Matrix have done a big job
Regards,
Bernard
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:59 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: A little bug in V5
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9710
Re: A little bug in V5
Hi,
Well I tryed on two different chips on the ten first positions and wathever I try to write it's allways 0.
Sorry for Matrix Staff to give you extra work
Bernard
Well I tryed on two different chips on the ten first positions and wathever I try to write it's allways 0.
Sorry for Matrix Staff to give you extra work
Bernard
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 2:43 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: A little bug in V5
- Replies: 14
- Views: 9710
A little bug in V5
Hello, I'm working today for the first time on V5 with a new project and are facing a little bug (maybe the first :wink: ) When I try to write to Eeprom the result is allways 0. When I try the same prog on V4 it's ok so ... I attached a little demo. My project is an automatic phonedialer for my alar...
- Wed Jan 18, 2012 11:01 am
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: V5 Upgrade ?
- Replies: 69
- Views: 37676
Re: V5 Upgrade ?
Hi Steve,
I used the "activation code" because it's very easy to just copy/paste from an Email.
PS : I started a new project this morning with V5 and it works like a charm
Bernard
I used the "activation code" because it's very easy to just copy/paste from an Email.
PS : I started a new project this morning with V5 and it works like a charm
Bernard
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 8:18 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: V5 Upgrade ?
- Replies: 69
- Views: 37676
Re: V5 Upgrade ?
Well, I filled in 1. Select Flowcode Variant: PIC 2. Select License Type: Professional 3. Company / Username: The exact name I used with my license. 4. Email Address: Idem as above 5. Discount code : Not filled in 6. Previous CD code : My license code I received via Email after activation. After thi...
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 7:36 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: V5 Upgrade ?
- Replies: 69
- Views: 37676
Re: V5 Upgrade ?
If it can help I didn't use my cd license code but the activation code I received by mail afterwards
Bernard
Bernard
- Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:34 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: V5 Upgrade ?
- Replies: 69
- Views: 37676
Re: V5 Upgrade ?
Just bought and downloaded my upgrade to V5
Enjoy !
Enjoy !
- Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:31 am
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: V5 Upgrade ?
- Replies: 69
- Views: 37676
V5 Upgrade ?
Hello Matrixteam,
Do you have some news about when the release of V5 upgrade will come ?
Best regards,
Bernard
PS : Sorry for the stress
Do you have some news about when the release of V5 upgrade will come ?
Best regards,
Bernard
PS : Sorry for the stress
- Sat Oct 29, 2011 9:36 am
- Forum: Flowcode 4 Suggestions
- Topic: HEX display on I2c component
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5289
HEX display on I2c component
Hello,
It should be good to also add an option to view the outputs on the I2c component in HEX format (same as in the EEPROM component)
Kind Regards,
Bernard
It should be good to also add an option to view the outputs on the I2c component in HEX format (same as in the EEPROM component)
Kind Regards,
Bernard
- Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:46 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887 [Solved]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5949
Re: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887
Problem solved !
I had also a DS1307 in circuit and it seems to be a bad one ...
But I can't explain why it worked with the 18f4455
I'm happy, now I can go further
Thanks
I had also a DS1307 in circuit and it seems to be a bad one ...
But I can't explain why it worked with the 18f4455
I'm happy, now I can go further
Thanks
- Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:50 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887 [Solved]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5949
Re: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887
And here is the same program but with a 18F4455 (crazy)
- Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:07 pm
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887 [Solved]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5949
Re: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887
When I press reset the only thing I see on my scope is SDA that goes done for 850us and not after each reset. I checked the log, in the C compile no errors just warnings in assembler part (see copy) Test SAA1064.c success success Return code = 0 Launching the linker/assembler... c:\program files (x8...
- Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:29 am
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887 [Solved]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5949
Re: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887
Thanks ben for looking at my problem,
I am also using the EB006 V07 but unfortunately the program did not run...
What do you mean with "reset" is it just do a MCLR reset with the push button ?
Thaks for the help,
Bernard
I am also using the EB006 V07 but unfortunately the program did not run...
What do you mean with "reset" is it just do a MCLR reset with the push button ?
Thaks for the help,
Bernard
- Fri Oct 21, 2011 10:42 am
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887 [Solved]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5949
Re: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887
Hello all,
Can someone please test the program above and check if signals are ok on RC3/4 ?
I passed a lot of houres without any results
Thanks
Bernard
Can someone please test the program above and check if signals are ok on RC3/4 ?
I passed a lot of houres without any results
Thanks
Bernard
- Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:43 am
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: Enabling I2C component on a 16F887 [Solved]
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5949
Enabling I2C component on a 16F887 [Solved]
Hello, I try to communicate with a DS1307 and a SAA1064 via the I2C of a 16f887 (RC3 & RC4 used with pull-ups). I checked with my scope but I have no output... I switched over to a 18F4455 and then it works ! So I came back to the 16F887 and tested the RC0-7 ports with just led's and it was ok. I at...
- Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:32 am
- Forum: Flowcode V4
- Topic: RC5 on a 16F88
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8158
Re: RC5 on a 16F88
Thanks again Fotis for all this information
Best regards,
Bernard
Best regards,
Bernard