16F54

An area to discuss 8-bit PIC specific problems and examples

Moderator: Benj

Post Reply
crispin12
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 11 times
Contact:

16F54

Post by crispin12 »

Wanted to start a project this evening using PIC16F54 due to its extremely low cost (under 50p) and found there was no 16F54 chip definition file? Just wondering why this isn't included as its not a new device and quite popular due to its pricing. Is it possible to get a definition file for this device?

medelec35
Matrix Staff
Posts: 9520
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 2:27 pm
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Has thanked: 2585 times
Been thanked: 3815 times
Contact:

Re: 16F54

Post by medelec35 »

Hi crispin12,
The definition file is there:
16F54.png
(66.32 KiB) Downloaded 2349 times
Reason for cheapness is it's very limited.
You Will probably get frustrated developing projects for this device.

Martin
Martin

crispin12
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2017 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 11 times
Contact:

Re: 16F54

Post by crispin12 »

I'm using 7.1.1.0 and several of the pics shown in your screen shot aren't there for me. Matrix must have added them after 7.1.1.0. At least I know I can get them if I run the update. BTW I agree re. your comments. I spent a few hours last night going through the data sheet and found several limitations that have caused me to rethink my choice. Currently looking at 16F1507 as it has more i/p o/p and a more sophisticated hardware stack level. The 16F1507 is still around 50p in qty. and is huge leap in performance and features compared with the 54.
Thanks again for your reply.

medelec35
Matrix Staff
Posts: 9520
Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 2:27 pm
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Has thanked: 2585 times
Been thanked: 3815 times
Contact:

Re: 16F54

Post by medelec35 »

Not a problem.
Yes, 16F1507 would be the better alternative.
Good luck with your projects.

Martin
Martin

Post Reply